<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marc Davison Got Me Thinking&#8230;Does Size Really Matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staceyharmon.com/marc-davison-got-me-thinkingdoes-size-really-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staceyharmon.com/marc-davison-got-me-thinkingdoes-size-really-matter/</link>
	<description>The Modern Resume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:16:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://staceyharmon.com/marc-davison-got-me-thinkingdoes-size-really-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staceyharmon.com/?p=153#comment-12</guid>
		<description>We shouldn&#039;t have to drop our standards to the lowest common denominator.  Lousy photos, whether large or small will still be lousy photos!

If an agent can&#039;t take good photos, they need to hire someone who will. 

I vote for more thumbnails, and click for larger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shouldn&#8217;t have to drop our standards to the lowest common denominator.  Lousy photos, whether large or small will still be lousy photos!</p>
<p>If an agent can&#8217;t take good photos, they need to hire someone who will. </p>
<p>I vote for more thumbnails, and click for larger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Kawell</title>
		<link>http://staceyharmon.com/marc-davison-got-me-thinkingdoes-size-really-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Kawell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staceyharmon.com/?p=153#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Good post about photos and real estate! I agree with you both, mostly however with Marc - and this is only because of the very truthful statement about the photos that most agents submit - they are usually sub-quality. If there was a higher standard of practice regarding the quality of photos submitted, I would agree with Stacey on more thumbnails. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post about photos and real estate! I agree with you both, mostly however with Marc &#8211; and this is only because of the very truthful statement about the photos that most agents submit &#8211; they are usually sub-quality. If there was a higher standard of practice regarding the quality of photos submitted, I would agree with Stacey on more thumbnails. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Davison</title>
		<link>http://staceyharmon.com/marc-davison-got-me-thinkingdoes-size-really-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staceyharmon.com/?p=153#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Great article Stacy. 

I want to insert one thought though for you and your readers to think about. When searching eBay or iStock or Amazon, I agree that small photos are fine. Especially on iStock because every photo is professionally taken and maximized for thumbnail viewing. And each costs a few bucks to buy. 

But homes are a different story. There are no standards for photography and most agents take lousy pics. Hence they are not maximized for thumbnail viewing and often times, a user can easily pass over a home because of the photo. 

Considering the suggested retail cost of a home, the need for agents to outdo their competition, the extra mile they ought to go for their sellers, there&#039;s no question in my mind, creating a gallery view featuring one larger pic to represent a home in list view is a prudent differentiator and great bonus to users. 

Thanks for opportunity to share. 

marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Stacy. </p>
<p>I want to insert one thought though for you and your readers to think about. When searching eBay or iStock or Amazon, I agree that small photos are fine. Especially on iStock because every photo is professionally taken and maximized for thumbnail viewing. And each costs a few bucks to buy. </p>
<p>But homes are a different story. There are no standards for photography and most agents take lousy pics. Hence they are not maximized for thumbnail viewing and often times, a user can easily pass over a home because of the photo. </p>
<p>Considering the suggested retail cost of a home, the need for agents to outdo their competition, the extra mile they ought to go for their sellers, there&#8217;s no question in my mind, creating a gallery view featuring one larger pic to represent a home in list view is a prudent differentiator and great bonus to users. </p>
<p>Thanks for opportunity to share. </p>
<p>marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
